Letter to European elected officials

I addressed North America in the first letter. There is a region that is of greater concern, Europe. Europe for decades has been confused, or dizzy from US media. Creating a loss of direction and sense of self, resulting in social and economic decay. Thus this letter is necessary. What made Europe have so many utopian properties, was that people form subconscious emotional bonds with those of similar racial backgrounds through rapid instinctive recognition processes. An example is how the body senses family ties via quick visual and perceptual cues that outpace conscious thought. This allowed the majority of the citizens to focus their limited time on things higher in their needs hierarchy. They could use their time for relationship building, and creating high quality work, without worry of their safety or threats to basic needs. Programs are put in place to mitigate those risks in Europe in vain, it does not remove the inherent anxiety, stresses, and psychological walls when one is in physical proximity to people far from their own racial background. Forced multiculturalism needs to be stopped, as the long term negative effects don’t go away. That Europe should diversify its people like New York City, is not a benefit as many European leaders believe.

Misguided idolization of the US

Many modern European leaders understood the United States through rose colored goggles. There is this awe or view of grandioseness that is a path for Europe to follow. As much as the leaders of the Democratic Party in the United States may want this for Europe, it is not beneficial to European people. If these European leaders were taken to the industrial areas of New Jersey, the depths of Brooklyn, or the African towns in the deep South of the US, the fog on their glasses would clear. They would be able to see what diversity has led to for the majority of Americans. It brought despair, detachment, loss of identity and poverty. America has turned into a minority with extreme wealth, and the majority indebted to them. This is easy to do when people don’t have a social, biological or ethnic bond.

Humanities subconscious harmony

Europeans diluting their genetic population, and relying on other peoples as their workforce has made parts of Europe carry third world properties. These were once places of solitude and pride for its peoples. The continued dilution of its genetics will remove the emotional connection, which is the core of what makes an individual group of Europeans most content and joyous in their lives. This, and the near utopian societies they had built will continue to erode, and those who travel to visit will no longer be able to witness and enjoy that experience.

An individual’s physical bodies are aware of who their parents or siblings are before conscious awareness, this draws from research on familial recognition mechanisms. Humans use cues, including visual ones like facial resemblance. The brain processes similarities subconsciously via rapid neural pathways, such as those involving the amygdala, which handles emotional responses to faces faster than higher-level conscious cognition. Visual signals from the eyes reach the brain's emotional centers (like the thalamus-amygdala route) in milliseconds, bypassing slower conscious processing in the cortex, leading to instinctive feelings of familiarity or affinity before one "thinks" about it. This isn't limited to exact family, but extends to broader phenotypic matching—recognizing traits that look "like me" or my kin. It's not that the body "knows" independently, but rather that subconscious perceptual systems trigger emotional signals quicker than deliberate thought.

This subconscious processing influences everyday reactions and lives by accurately and quickly leading to smoother, more positive engagements. These engagements create better communication or rapport in daily settings. In diverse environments, this can result in subtle discomfort, or slower trust-building with out-group members. This affecting everything from workplace dynamics to casual encounters, as the brain expends more effort on unfamiliar cues. Conversely, around similar-looking people, reactions are often more naturally fond or affiliative, fostering easier bonding, reduced stress, and a sense of belonging that permeates routine life. Think quicker smiles, more open body language, or instinctive helpfulness in group settings. Over time, this makes daily experiences more harmonious when surrounded by similar members, as emotional energy is not diverted to navigating differences.

Myth of social mobility

Some argue that the African Americans in New York City and the North Africans in France have the opportunity for advancement, education and wealth as their upper class citizens do. There is an ever shrinking amount of middle class jobs in Western society. Mobility does happen, but rarely, and in proportion to the percentage of the population of their ethnic group in the country. It is then promoted in media sources to give the belief that all people can do this. This marketing tactic works, as the general populous believes this is what happens to most of the low paid workers. The truth is the opposite, as many decades of this system has shown.

The path less travelled

The cavern between Americans and Europeans consistently grows further. Europe, after many generations of separation, has become a separate group of races from its American relatives. Although many American genetics come from the Europe. It has since been altered and mixed with other racial groups. In addition, even among American European ancestry their offspring is a mix of drastically different European peoples. This result is soon to have the two continents peoples be as far different as Native Hawaiians and Greeks.

It is time Europe takes its own path. Most decisions Europe makes in alliance with the United States are not in its best interest, but in the interest of North East American wealthy groups. Europe no longer needs to make any decisions that align with American interests. It can be independent, even after reeling from two major wars.

Some European countries saw the advancements the United States made economically, and tried to emulate them to enrich their upper class. It’s an example that France tries to replicate with North African labor. It was an attempt to replicate the use of African Americans as low income labor for the worst jobs in New York City. It didn’t work out as well for France, as North African peoples tend to be aggressive, and are keen as to what the French are using their labor for. There is also a religious aspect as North Africans tend to follow religions that are hostile to native European populations.

Labor determines demographics

As the Spartan society of the past was overridden by their majority slave class, so too does France, Germany and most of Europe run that risk. Using other ethnicities for a cheap labor source within one ethnic group’s country is only a short term benefit. However, this short sightedness has drastic long term negative effects. For the United States the experiment has failed, the world will watch as the country attempts to find its own identity as a new country. With no ethnic or racial background, the non-Caucasian group will continue to suffer. The United States will continue to use wealth and media to distract from the real world truths. The country will remain bi-focated between a Caucasian populous trying to live their lives as half of their government does all it can to break apart the strong pockets of homogeneity that are left. This conflict stalls forward momentum, innovation, and prosperity, with China pulling ahead partly due to not having this impediment.

Europe still has pockets of homogenous peoples. By trying to emulate the cheap labor model in the U.S., they risk losing that benefit found in countries such as Japan, China, and Saudi Arabia. (These countries aren’t perfect but they will benefit greatly with today’s technological innovations) France has pockets of slums and mental health conditions that are not attended to, now that they have a new lower working class populous, it requires enforcement of order to be productive for the upper class.

Diversity no longer benefits

There are arguments that homogeneity comes with trade-offs, such as limited innovation. Before the internet, transferring of ideas or innovation was slow. With the speed of communication today, ideas, innovation and collaboration have no borders, and can move at the speed of a fiber optic cable. Technological advances have also allowed groups of peoples to adapt quickly with the global flow of information. The adaptability of diverse societies that may have been seen as a benefit is no longer limited to diverse societies. All groups of people can now easily view broad perspectives. There were perceived economic advantages to diversity as well. Again with technology, the flow and speed of information has pushed over the walls that were there economically. For example a researcher in a US institution can easily collaborate on a project with a team in the same field in Japan through video conferencing. Countries that have remained homogeneous could have an advantage of now, benefitting from both homogeneity and diversity through technology. While diverse countries lose the benefits of homogeneity.

Countries that can be racially homogeneous leverage natural affinities, leading to higher social cohesion, trust, and reduced intergroup tensions. In such settings, people can interact without the cognitive load of out-group biases. They can have a shared sense of identity, and mutual support that enhances community stability and well-being. Homogeneous groups often experience less conflict and stronger in-group bonds, avoiding the drawbacks of forced multiculturalism, such as lower social capital, or stereotypes in diverse areas. The problem of stereotypes isn’t there because the group is largely one culture.

When individual satisfaction harms the whole

Emotional connection often manifests subconsciously, leading to quicker empathy, trust, and positive emotional responses toward those perceived as similar. For instance, studies on emotion recognition show that people are better at interpreting facial expressions and feeling empathetic connections with individuals of the same ethnicity, partly due to familiarity with those cues. It's a broader human tendency rooted in evolutionary psychology, where identifying with "in-group" members historically aided survival and cooperation. This is self destructively being abandoned so that a few policy makers can feel the emotional dopamine release from the perception they are helping a few people. Similar to someone who sends money to a television advertisement asking for money to help those in a different country. Sending money to a disadvantaged group, where it’s certified the funds are used properly is a good thing. Removing the benefits of a homogenous society for the emotional satisfaction of perceived help to a few people is not.

Europe can rebuild its place in the world once it brings back its homogenous peoples. Encouraging people to have children and rebuilding would lay a foundation for a new era. Europeans could then again focus on positive was to better society, and help to achieve social harmony even better than before the they started forced multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is a mask of cultural destruction to meld peoples into one group that is only left with labor and consumption. It is time to bring back homogenous communities that increase productivity, implement robotics and AI, remove the negative multicultural aspects of everyday life, and thrive.

Here is a list of sources where other research can be accessed. Note that some may require institutional access or free registration for full text.

1. Oxytocin and in-group trust **: Wikipedia overview with references to key studies (e.g., De Dreu on oxytocin and in-group trust). URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-group_favoritism
2. Emotion recognition and empathy within same ethnicity**: Soto & Levenson (2009) study on cultural equivalence vs. advantage in empathic accuracy. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2877627/
3. Own-race bias and its impact on social interactions**: Zhao et al. (2014) on implicit racial bias and other-race face processing. URL: https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-021-00337-7
4. Cross-race effect in face processing and memory**: Meissner & Brigham (2001) meta-analysis on the cross-race effect. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-race_effect (links to primary studies); full meta-analysis via https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3496291/
5. Cognitive load in diverse social settings**: Research on social presence and cognitive load in online/diverse environments (e.g., Joo et al., 2019). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332310640_The_relationship_between_social_presence_and_cognitive_load
6. Subconscious trust and positive responses to in-group members**: Evans & Krueger (2014) on trusting outgroup vs. ingroup via neural evidence. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5516679/
7. Kin recognition mechanisms**: Holmes & Sherman (2019) overview of conceptual issues and mechanisms. URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_3
8. Olfactory and phenotypic cues in kin detection**: Porter & Cernoch (1983) study on human kin recognition by olfactory cues. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7199737/
9. Rapid neural pathways (amygdala) in emotional face processing**: Garvert et al. (2014) on subcortical amygdala pathways for rapid face processing. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4229499/
10. Visual signals and subconscious emotional responses**: Rigoulot et al. (2013) on emotional signals from faces influencing fixations and pupil size. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00810/full
11. Social cohesion in racially homogeneous societies**: Laurence (2016) longitudinal analysis on ethnic diversity and community cohesion. URL: https://academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332
12. Benefits of shared identity in uniform communities**: Sani et al. (2019) on group identities satisfying needs for well-being. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103118308047
13. Innovation and economic advantages in diverse societies**: Ozgen (2021) review on diversity's economic impacts. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12433
14. Reduced conflict and social capital in homogeneous groups**: Adesope & Adebiyi (2019) on culturally homogeneous vs. heterogeneous groups and conflict. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176798000029